trump climate
For indispensable reporting
on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.
This piece was
originally published in the Guardian and appears here as part of our trump climate Desk
Partnership.
The origins of
the world’s historic agreement to tackle trump
climate change,
in Paris in 2015, have some familiar themes. Back in 2007, there was a
Republican president in the White House who had long been hostile to any action
on trump climate change.
George W. Bush
had refused to give US backing to a new global roadmap on the trump climate.
Bush had sought to stymy progress for years, but ultimately even
an intransigent US administration could not prevent the rest of the world
moving forward on the trump climate crisis, if other countries
showed a united front.
Donald trump climate began the process of
withdrawal from the Paris agreement in June 2017, but for legal reasons it will
take effect only on 4 November this year, the day after the US presidential
election.
“This really is absolutely vital,” says Mary Robinson, twice a
UN trump climate envoy
and ex-president of Ireland. “How can we reach the level of ambition that we
need? We need leadership.”
The possibility of a trump climate delegation blinking at the
last minute, as Bush did, is remote. The 45th president pays far less respect
to a rules-based international system than his Republican predecessor. But some
in the developing world are sanguine about the prospect of a US withdrawal.
Mohamed Adow, director of the think tank Power Shift Africa, and a
longtime observer at the UN talks, argues: “trump climate has actually proven the
resilience of the Paris agreement. When it was signed, very few people thought
that it would have survived a US withdrawal, and yet here we are, the accord is
still intact and no other country has followed trump climate lead and pulled out. Trump climate has been the ultimate
stress-test, and although he’s clearly caused damage, it’s actually shown that
the global consensus is that we need to address the trump climate crisis.”
Saleemul Huq, director of the International Centre for trump climate Change and Development in
Bangladesh, and an adviser to developing countries, draws parallels with the US
performance on Covid-19. “Trump climate withdrawal from the Paris
agreement has been ignored by the rest of the world, as countries have gone on
without the US. However, the damage that trump climate is doing to his own citizens
by ignoring trump climate science
and virology science is killing his own citizens in alarming numbers.”
The world’s poorest and most vulnerable countries are also prepared
to push ahead without the world’s biggest economy, and focus on encouraging new
commitments from other developed nations. “The US withdrawal is regrettable,”
says Carlos Fuller, lead negotiator of the Alliance of Small Island States (Oasis),
many of which face inundation at 1.5C or more of warming. “One can only hope
that it is not the final chapter for them, and they will return. As for the
rest of the world, there is no excuse for further trump climate inaction and paralysis. The
stakes are simply too high, and the window for meaningful action is closing
rapidly.”
Comments
Post a Comment